United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service		 Oregon Go to Accessibility Information
Skip to Page Content





Southwest Oregon Basin - FY08 Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)

Ranking Criteria and Practice Payment List by Funding Pool

  • Coos/Curry - Plant Health
  • Coos/Curry - Water Quality & Quantity
  • Douglas - Forestland
  • Douglas - Irrigation Water Quality & Quantity
  • Douglas - Pasture/Hayland
  • Jackson - Forestland
  • Jackson - Grazingland
  • Jackson - Irrigation Efficiency Improvement & Water Quality
  • Josephine - Forestland
  • Josephine - Instream Water Quality
  • Josephine - Pasture/Hayland
     
    •

    Funding Pool:  (Coos/Curry - Plant Health)

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment result in the improved management of livestock or wildlife? 50
    2 Is a grazing land management plan or forest land stewardship plan being used to guide the planned treatment? 50
    3 Will the treatment improve grazing land health or forest land health 50
    4 Will the planned treatment result in a reduction of invasive or undesirable species? 25
    5 Are there active water courses on or within 50 feet of the planned land unit? 25

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points: 200

    (Coos/Curry - Plant Health) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coos/Curry - Plant Health (PDF, 93 KB) - September 2007


    Funding Pool:  (Coos/Curry - Water Quality & Quantity)

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Does the operation include a confined livestock facility? 50
    2 Will the planned treatment improve water quality or irrigation efficiency? 50
    3 Are there perennial water courses that will be improved by using practices that stop or prevent active erosion within or downstream of the planned treatment area? 30
    4 Will the planned treatment result in reduced use of irrigation water or increased capacity of irrigation water storage? 30
    5 Is wildlife habitat improved by incorporating components that provide for additional wildlife water, cover and food? 20
    6 Does the operation apply nutrients (manure, commercial fertilizer, lime, sludge)? 20

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points: 200

    (Coos/Curry - Water Quality & Quantity) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coos/Curry - Water Quality & Quantity (PDF, 81 KB) - September 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Douglas - Forestland)

    Description: These treatments will result in improved wildlife habitat and reduction in potential air quality emissions associated with wildfires. By improving species selection, overstocking and brush control, the risk of wildfires and the resulting air emissions are greatly reduced. Wildlife habitat and quality is improved by having healthier forestlands.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment address resource concerns on unhealthy forest stands and/or grazed forestlands (overstocked, diseased, wildfire prevention, etc.)? 30
    2 Will the treatment address resource concerns that are the result of understocked forest stands due to wildfire (replanting trees, etc.) 25
    3 Will the treatment address resource concerns that are the result of understocked forest stands due to wildfire (replanting trees, etc.) 25
    4 Will the treatment address resource concerns such as brush/weed growth on forestland with adequately stocked stands? 10
    5 Will the treatment address streamside improvements needed (above ordinary high water, establishment of trees, etc.) on forestlands? 10

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points: 100

    (Douglas - Forestland) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Douglas - Forestland (PDF, 54 KB) - October 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Douglas - Irrigation Water Quality & Quantity)

    Improvement of existing irrigation water delivery systems by conversion to a more efficient system improves water use efficiency. Improved irrigation water application efficiency improves water quality with fewer nutrient and organics moved off site thereby benefiting aquatic Threatened and Endangered Species.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment improve irrigation efficiency by upgrading from a current system type to one with a higher expected irrigation efficiency (i.e. wheeline to pivot, etc.)? 45
    2 Is the EQIP application accompanied with a preliminary irrigation system design and irrigation water management guidance that meets NRCS standards OR will the contract holder obtain and provide these designs and guidance within 11 months of signing the contract to maintain contract compliance? 30
    3 Does the applicant have or will be in possession of the necessary permits (wetland, fill & removal, etc.) easements/access, water rights, and point of diversion (POD) transfers, etc. within 11 months of signing the contract to maintain contract compliance? Note: Landowner assumes responsibility for all such assurances and assumes contract compliance risks if they proceed with EQIP contracting. 10
    4 Will irrigation be scheduled based on soil moisture monitoring using the weather stations, daily/regular ET calculations, pressure sensing, or other newer technology? 10
    5 Will irrigation be scheduled according to the "feel &appearance" method to determine soil moisture? 5

    Maximum Points:  100
    Total Points: 100

    (Douglas - Irrigation Water Quality & Quantity) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Douglas - Irrigation Water Quality & Quantity (PDF, 60 KB) - October 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Douglas - Pasture/Hayland)

    These treatments will result in improved water quality and wildlife habitat on these lands. Improved management of pasturelands will result in less sediment and nutrient transport in water that impacts aquatic Threatened and Endangered Species. Additional benefits will be gained through improved management of grazing lands that include Threatened Habitats such as Oak Savannah habitat.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment require additional fences and/or water systems to properly manage grazing? 50
    2 Will the treatment require brush control to control invasive weed species? 30
    3 Will the treatment require pasture planting to control excessive sheet and rill erosion after brush control or wildfire? 20

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:   100

    (Douglas - Pasture/Hayland) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Douglas - Pasture/Hayland (PDF, 151 KB) - October 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Jackson - Forestland)

    Private non-industrial forestlands are not actively managed to address excessive fuel loads and woodland resource sustainability can impair animal, soil, water, air, and plant quality when wildfire occurs. The excessive tree and/or shrub density impair the health and vigor of uplands, creating high wildfire risk. This leads to subsequent wildlife habitat loss, increased soil erosion, reduced water infiltration, decreased percolation, and reduced stream flows. Carbon sequestration is also reduced when forest lands burn, and replenished when trees are planted. Jackson County has been designated as a "Non Attainment Area for Particulate Matter 10". This practice to be used in “pre-commercial” conifer and mixed conifer stands or oak savannah.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will EQIP treatment(s) result in fuel loading reduction and/or promote healthy forest lands that will be resilient to wildfire, thereby reducing particulate matter from emissions and promoting proper watershed function? If yes 45
    2 Will EQIP assist in “creating” greater resilience in forest lands by planting and managing suitable tree species? If yes: 40
    3 Will the EQIP treatment or associated practices(s) result in improved food, shelter, and/or cover for Threatened and /or Endangered Species or other upland wildlife? 20
    4 Does the participant have a conservation plan or forestry management plan that is ready to implement with little to no requirements required by NRCS? If yes: 20
    5 Previous contracts have been completed on time; or applicant has a current EQIP contract which is being implemented on schedule; or is this is the first EQIP application submitted? If yes: 15
    6 Is the area to be treated rated as “high risk” in the Jackson County Wildland Risk Fire Assessment? If yes to 6, then no to 7 & 8. 30
    7 Is the area to be treated rated as “medium risk” in the Jackson County Wildland Risk Fire Assessment? If yes to 7, then no to 6 & 8. 20
    8 Is the area to be treated rated as “low risk” in the Jackson County Wildland Risk Fire Assessment? If yes to 8, then no to 6 & 7. 10

    Maximum Points:  170
    Total Points:  200

    (Jackson - Forestland) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  (Jackson - Grazingland)

    Grazing lands lacking infrastructure, proper grazing management, and/or adequate perennial vegetation can be sources of non-point source pollution, which may contribute sediment, nutrients, and/or chemicals to surface water bodies that impact water quality. Lack of infrastructure (cross fencing, watering facilities, and pipelines, etc.) does not facilitate proper grazing and current vegetative species do not protect the soil from excessive erosion which can lead to non-point source pollution contributions to surface bodies that can impact aquatic habitat of at-risk species.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will infrastructure such as fencing, and watering facilities, etc be installed to promote improved plant health and vigor through proper grazing management? 60
    2 Does the participant have a conservation plan that will address proper grazing management and is he ready to implement it? 30
    3 Will the EQIP treatment result in proper application and management of nutrients (through soil testing or tissue sample analysis). Will the applicant utilize local CCA recommendations or Oregon State University guidance as reviewed and approve by an NRCS representative? 45
    4 Will the EQIP treatment reduce/replace noxious plant species with perennial (desirable species) that will result in reduced soil erosion on moderate to high productivity sites or protect and/or improve surface water quality? If yes to 4, then no on 5. 45
    5 Will the EQIP treatment reduce/replace noxious plant species with perennial (desirable species) that will result in reduced soil erosion on fair productivity sites or protect and/or improve surface water quality? No points given for site class 8. If yes to 5, then no on 4. 25
    6 Will the EQIP treatment result in proper application and management of pesticides or chemicals? The applicant will utilize Certified Crop Advisors (CCA) or other certified consultants for evaluation and recommendations? 20
    7 Previous contracts have been completed on time; or applicant has a current EQIP contract which is being implemented on schedule; or is this is the first EQIP application submitted? 15

    Maximum Points:  215
    Total Points:  240

    (Jackson - Grazingland) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  (Jackson - Irrigation Efficiency Improvement & Water Quality)

    Inefficient on-farm irrigation systems, conveyance systems, and/or poor management of irrigation water result in overuse, waste, and non-uniform water distribution which are associated with concentrated flows, surface runoff, and deep percolation, leading to waste of water and consequent water quality problems for other beneficial uses. Additionally, surface water quality and associated beneficial uses can be impacted by improper use/management of pesticides and nutrients.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the planned system convert surface flood system to a drip irrigation system, resulting in a high water savings and project cost effectiveness? If yes on 1, no on 2 & 3. 40
    2 Will the planned system convert surface flood system to a sprinkler irrigation system, resulting in a moderate water savings and project cost effectiveness? If yes on 2, then no on 1 & 3. 20
    3 Will the planned system convert uncontrolled surface flood system to a controlled surface system resulting in a low water savings and project cost effectiveness? If yes on 3, then no on 1 & 2. 10
    4 Will the planned system include new water management tools such as variable speed pump controllers, automated moisture sensors and/or flow control? If yes: 5
    5 Will irrigation be scheduled and irrigation records kept utilizing the “feel & appearance” method to determine soil moisture? If yes on 7, no on 8: 10
    6 Will irrigation be scheduled and irrigation records kept to document use of weather station data (such as daily evapotranspiration, and precipitation, etc.), pressure sensing, or other new conservation technology? If yes on 8, no on 7: 20
    7 Will the EQIP treatment result in proper application, management, and documentation (recordkeeping) of nutrients following NRCS recommended standards? If yes: 20
    8 Will the EQIP treatment result in the proper evaluation of pests, application, management, and documentation (recordkeeping) of pesticides/chemicals following NRCS recommended standards? If yes: 20
    9 Will EQIP treatment result in a reduction/prevention of irrigation-induced erosion and/or nonpoint source pollution to improve water quality? If yes: 20
    10 Is the conservation management unit located in the watershed with a TMDL or 303(d) listed stream? 30

    Maximum Points:  155
    Total Points:  195

    (Jackson - Irrigation Efficiency Improvement & Water Quality) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  (Josephine - Forestland)

    These treatments will result in improved wildlife habitat and reduction in potential air quality emissions associated with wildfires. By improving species selection, overstocking and brush control, the risk of wildfires and the resulting air emissions are greatly reduced. Wildlife habitat and quality is improved by having healthier forestlands..

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment address resource concerns on unhealthy forest stands and/or grazed forestlands (overstocked, diseased, wildfire prevention, etc.)? 30
    2 Will the treatment address resource concerns that are the result of understocked forest stands due to wildfire (replanting trees, etc.) 25
    3 Will the treatment address resource concerns such as a need to replant trees on forestland that are overgrown with brush and beyond the Forest Practices Act establishment timeframe? 25
    4 Will the treatment address resource concerns such as brush/weed growth on forestland with adequately stocked stands? 10
    5 Will the treatment address streamside improvements needed (above ordinary high water, establishment of trees, etc.) on forestlands? 10

    Maximum Points: 
    Total Points:  100

    (Josephine - Forestland) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Adobe Acrobat DocumentJosephine - Forestland (54 KB) - October 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Josephine - Instream Water Quality)

    Instream water quality that is degraded threatens aquatic Threatened and Endangered Species. Treatments that resolve these threats to instream water quality are beneficial to the listed species.

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment improve and/or protect habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species? 20
    2 Will the treatment improve instream water quality? 15
    3 Will the treatment protect high value agricultural lands? 15
    4 Will the project design, permit assistance, construction oversite and checkout be provided by the contract holder using a Professional Engineer that meets NRCS standards and will the contract holder provide the design within 11 months of signing the contract to maintain contract compliance? 50

    Maximum Points:  100
    Total Points:  100

    (Josephine - Instream Water Quality) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Adobe Acrobat DocumentJosephine - Instream Water Quality (53 KB) - October 2007

     

    Funding Pool:  (Josephine - Pasture/Hayland)

    These treatments will result in improved water quality and wildlife habitat on these lands. Improved management of pasturelands will result in less sediment and nutrient transport in water that impacts aquatic Threatened and Endangered Species. Additional benefits will be gained through improved management of grazing lands that include Threatened Habitats such as Oak Savannah habitat..

    Local Ranking Criteria
    1 Will the treatment require additional fences and/or water systems to properly manage grazing? 50
    2 Will the treatment require brush control to control invasive weed species? 30
    3 Will the treatment require pasture planting to control excessive sheet and rill erosion after brush control or wildfire? 20

    Maximum Points: 
    Total Points:  100

    (Josephine - Pasture/Hayland) Practice Payment List

    This document requiresAdobe Acrobat DocumentAdobe Acrobat Reader.

    Adobe Acrobat DocumentJosephine - Pasture/Hayland (151 KB) - October 2007

     

    Local Contact:
    Please contact the District Conservationist in the USDA Service Center nearest the location of your property.

    Last Modified:  09/09/2008

    < Back to EQIP