|
| |
High Desert Basin - FY08 Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
Ranking Criteria and Practice Payment List by Funding Pool
High Desert - Basin - Wildfire
High Desert - Basin - Wildlife Habitat
High Desert - Harney - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates
High
Desert - Harney - Water Management - Irrigated Land
High Desert - Klamath - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates
High Desert - Klamath - Water Quantity - Water Management Irrigation
Land
High Desert - Lake - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminate
High Desert - Lake - Water Quantity - Water Management - Irrigated Lake
Special Initiative for restoring grazing and/or forest lands damaged by
wildfires. The intent is to accelerate vegetative recovery, reduce watershed
erosion and sedimentation, and to reduce environmental degradation resulting
from catastrophic wildfires.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
No local issue questions for this funding pool. |
High Desert - Basin - Wildfire) Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Creation, restoration, and enhancement of upland wildlife habitats
(sage-steppe, aspen woodlands, grasslands, riparian areas, ponderosa pine) and
corridors for species at risk, species of concern, and other terrestrial
species.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
50 |
| 2 |
Will the treatment you intend to implement result in the creation,
enhancement, and/or restoration of grasslands, riparians, sagebrush, or
shrub steppe habitats and with a specific focus on improvements to Sage
Grouse habitat? |
30 |
| 3 |
Will the treatment you intend to implement result in the creation,
enhancement, and/or restoration of aspen woodlands, ponderosa pine,
grasslands, riparians, sagebrush or shrub steppe habitats and with a
focus on the winter range for mule deer and/or elk? |
20 |
| 4 |
Will the treatment acres you intend to implement be on designated
primarily for wildlife use? |
30 |
| 5 |
Will the treatment you intend to implement be done so in conjunction
with similar habitat improvements on adjacent lands (ownerships)? |
20 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 150
High Desert - Basin - Wildlife Habitat Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately
35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water
bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor
management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion
in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these
changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and
fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to
address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource
concern for the Harney County LWG EQIP- Regular funds will be used to stabilize
upland conditions and promote proper livestock management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
75 |
| 2 |
Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of improvements to livestock management. |
100 |
| 3 |
Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. |
50 |
| 4 |
Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved
CNMP. |
25 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 250
High Desert - Harney - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
The Harney/Malheur Lakes 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) sub basin is
950,000 acres in size. Forty percent is private land, and the remainder is
public land. Sixty-one percent of the sub basin is rangeland, and the rest is
pastureland, hay land, water, wetland, and forestland. There are 178 farms and
ranches in the sub basin. About 25 percent of the operations are less than 50
acres in size, about 50 percent are 50 to 1,000 acres in size, and the remaining
25 percent are more than 1,000 acres in size. Most of the farmers and ranchers
rely on off-farm income. In recent years, more and more of the land has been
bought by newcomers to the area and is under absentee and investor ownership or
corporate ownership. The sub basin includes approximately 78,400 acres of
irrigated cropland. The principal irrigated crops include alfalfa, grass hay and
pasture. Irrigation systems include surface flood, and older center pivots or
wheel lines which operating efficiencies below 55 percent. Sources of irrigation
water include both groundwater and surface waters. Areas in which ground water
serves as the primary source as experiencing overdraft of the aquifer(s). Most
of the farmers and ranchers are aware of local resource concern and appreciate
the effect conservation has on this concern; however, due to general enterprise
budgets for the farm operations and or limited experience conservation has not
been perceived to be economically feasible. On farm irrigation conservation is
seen as a key element in addressing the restricted (over drafted) aquifers. As
the primary resource concern for the Harney County LWG EQIP- Regular and
EQIP-GSWC funds will be used to promote water conservation through cost share
and incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements and
irrigation water management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
75 |
| 2 |
Irrigation improvements leading to reductions in withdraws from the
Groundwater Restricted Area of the Harney /Malheur Lakes (17120001)
Watershed. |
65 |
| 3 |
Irrigation improvements leading to reductions in withdraws from ground
or surface waters in Harney County outside of the Groundwater Restricted
Area of the Harney /Malheur Lakes (17120001) Watershed. |
45 |
| 4 |
High cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
35 |
| 5 |
Medium cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
20 |
| 6 |
Low cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
0 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 240
High Desert - Harney - Water Managemnet - Irrigated Land Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately
35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water
bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor
management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion
in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these
changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and
fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to
address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource
concern for Klamath County EQIP funds will be used to stabilize upland
conditions and promote proper livestock management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
75 |
| 2 |
Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of improvements to livestock management. |
100 |
| 3 |
Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. |
50 |
| 4 |
Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved
CNMP. |
25 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 250
High Desert - Klamath - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Agricultural lands used for irrigated crops, hay and pasture. Irrigation
systems include surface flood, and older center pivots or wheel lines which
operating efficiencies below 55 percent. On farm irrigation conservation is seen
as a key element in addressing improvements in the quantity and quality of
surface waters. EQIP funds will be used to promote water conservation through
cost share and incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements
and irrigation water management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
25 |
| 2 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 61.00 to 63.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
122 |
| 3 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 58.00 to 60.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
116 |
| 4 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 55.00 to 57.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
110 |
| 5 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 52.00 to 54.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
104 |
| 6 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 49.00 to 51.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
98 |
| 7 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 46.00 to 48.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
92 |
| 8 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 43.00 to 45.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
86 |
| 9 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 40.00 to 42.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
80 |
| 10 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 37.00 to 39.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
74 |
| 11 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 34.00 to 36.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
68 |
| 12 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 31.00 to 33.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
62 |
| 13 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 28.00 to 30.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
56 |
| 14 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 25.00 to 27.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
50 |
| 15 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 22.00 to 24.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
33 |
| 16 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 19.00 to 21.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
29 |
| 17 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 16.00 to 18.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
24 |
| 18 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 13.00 to 15.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
13 |
| 19 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 10.00 to 12.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
10 |
| 20 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 7.00 to 9.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
7 |
| 21 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 4.00 to 6.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
4 |
| 22 |
For applications with an estimated net water savings of 0.01 to 0.99
acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking
criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). |
1 |
Maximum Points: 147
Total Points: 1264
High Desert - Klamath - Water Quantity - Water Management Irrigation
Land Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately
35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water
bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor
management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion
in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these
changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and
fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to
address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource
concern for the Lake County LWG EQIP- Regular funds will be used to stabilize
upland conditions and promote proper livestock management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
75 |
| 2 |
Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of improvements to livestock management. |
100 |
| 3 |
Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource
issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result
of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. |
50 |
| 4 |
Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved
CNMP. |
25 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 250
High Desert - Lake - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminate Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
The Summer Lake 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) sub basin (Fort
Rock/Silver Lake Basins) is comprised of 2.6 million acres, mostly in Lake
County. Sixty percent of the sub basin is shrub land and rangeland, twenty
percent is forestland, and about ten percent is grassland, hay land, and
pastureland. There are 167 farms and 278 operators in the sub basin. Many of the
farms and ranches are only marginally profitable. Most of the farmers and
ranchers are aware of local resource concerns and appreciate the effect
conservation has on these concerns; however, due to general enterprise budgets
for the farm operations conservation has not been perceived to be economically
feasible. Approximately 60% of the sub basin is included within a ground water
restricted area recognized by the State of Oregon. The majority of the sub
basin’s 71,800 acres of irrigated cropland are located within this area. The
principal irrigated crops include alfalfa, grass hay and pasture. Irrigation
systems are typically comprised of older center pivots or wheel lines which
operating efficiencies below 55 percent. On farm irrigation conservation is seen
as a key element in addressing the restricted (over drafted) aquifers. As the
primary resource concern for the Lake County LWG EQIP- Regular and EQIP-GSWC
funds will be used to promote water conservation through cost share and
incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements and irrigation
water management.
Local Ranking Criteria
|
| 1 |
Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed,
cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of
the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? |
75 |
| 2 |
Will the irrigation improvements result in reductions in withdraws from
the Ground Water Restricted Area of the Summer Lake (17120005)
Watershed? |
65 |
| 3 |
Will the irrigation improvements result in reductions in withdraws from
ground or surface waters outside of the Summer Lake (17120005)
Watershed? |
45 |
| 4 |
High cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
35 |
| 5 |
Medium cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
20 |
| 6 |
Low cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? |
0 |
Maximum Points:
Total Points: 240
High Desert - Lake - Water Quantity - Water Management - Irrigated Lake Practice Payment List
This document requires Adobe
Acrobat Reader.
Coming soon
Local Contact:
Please contact the District Conservationist in the
USDA Service Center nearest
the location of your property.
Last Modified:
09/09/2008
< Back to EQIP
| |
|