United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Oregon Go to Accessibility Information
Skip to Page Content





High Desert Basin - FY08 Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)

Ranking Criteria and Practice Payment List by Funding Pool

  • High Desert - Basin - Wildfire
  • High Desert - Basin - Wildlife Habitat
  • High Desert - Harney - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates
  • High Desert - Harney - Water Management - Irrigated Land
  • High Desert - Klamath - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates
  • High Desert - Klamath - Water Quantity - Water Management Irrigation Land
  • High Desert - Lake - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminate
  • High Desert - Lake - Water Quantity - Water Management - Irrigated Lake
     
  • Funding Pool:  High Desert - Basin - Wildfire)

    Special Initiative for restoring grazing and/or forest lands damaged by wildfires. The intent is to accelerate vegetative recovery, reduce watershed erosion and sedimentation, and to reduce environmental degradation resulting from catastrophic wildfires.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 No local issue questions for this funding pool.
    High Desert - Basin - Wildfire) Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Basin - Wildlife Habitat

    Creation, restoration, and enhancement of upland wildlife habitats (sage-steppe, aspen woodlands, grasslands, riparian areas, ponderosa pine) and corridors for species at risk, species of concern, and other terrestrial species.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 50
    2 Will the treatment you intend to implement result in the creation, enhancement, and/or restoration of grasslands, riparians, sagebrush, or shrub steppe habitats and with a specific focus on improvements to Sage Grouse habitat? 30
    3 Will the treatment you intend to implement result in the creation, enhancement, and/or restoration of aspen woodlands, ponderosa pine, grasslands, riparians, sagebrush or shrub steppe habitats and with a focus on the winter range for mule deer and/or elk? 20
    4 Will the treatment acres you intend to implement be on designated primarily for wildlife use? 30
    5 Will the treatment you intend to implement be done so in conjunction with similar habitat improvements on adjacent lands (ownerships)? 20

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:  150

    High Desert - Basin - Wildlife Habitat Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Harney - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates

    Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately 35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource concern for the Harney County LWG EQIP- Regular funds will be used to stabilize upland conditions and promote proper livestock management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 75
    2 Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of improvements to livestock management. 100
    3 Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. 50
    4 Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved CNMP. 25

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:  250

    High Desert - Harney - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Harney - Water Mgmt - Irrigated Land

    The Harney/Malheur Lakes 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) sub basin is 950,000 acres in size. Forty percent is private land, and the remainder is public land. Sixty-one percent of the sub basin is rangeland, and the rest is pastureland, hay land, water, wetland, and forestland. There are 178 farms and ranches in the sub basin. About 25 percent of the operations are less than 50 acres in size, about 50 percent are 50 to 1,000 acres in size, and the remaining 25 percent are more than 1,000 acres in size. Most of the farmers and ranchers rely on off-farm income. In recent years, more and more of the land has been bought by newcomers to the area and is under absentee and investor ownership or corporate ownership. The sub basin includes approximately 78,400 acres of irrigated cropland. The principal irrigated crops include alfalfa, grass hay and pasture. Irrigation systems include surface flood, and older center pivots or wheel lines which operating efficiencies below 55 percent. Sources of irrigation water include both groundwater and surface waters. Areas in which ground water serves as the primary source as experiencing overdraft of the aquifer(s). Most of the farmers and ranchers are aware of local resource concern and appreciate the effect conservation has on this concern; however, due to general enterprise budgets for the farm operations and or limited experience conservation has not been perceived to be economically feasible. On farm irrigation conservation is seen as a key element in addressing the restricted (over drafted) aquifers. As the primary resource concern for the Harney County LWG EQIP- Regular and EQIP-GSWC funds will be used to promote water conservation through cost share and incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements and irrigation water management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 75
    2 Irrigation improvements leading to reductions in withdraws from the Groundwater Restricted Area of the Harney /Malheur Lakes (17120001) Watershed. 65
    3 Irrigation improvements leading to reductions in withdraws from ground or surface waters in Harney County outside of the Groundwater Restricted Area of the Harney /Malheur Lakes (17120001) Watershed. 45
    4 High cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 35
    5 Medium cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 20
    6 Low cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 0

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:   240

    High Desert - Harney - Water Managemnet - Irrigated Land Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Klamath - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates

    Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately 35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource concern for Klamath County EQIP funds will be used to stabilize upland conditions and promote proper livestock management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 75
    2 Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of improvements to livestock management. 100
    3 Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. 50
    4 Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved CNMP. 25

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:  250

    High Desert - Klamath - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Klamath - Water Quantity - Water Management Irrigation Land

    Agricultural lands used for irrigated crops, hay and pasture. Irrigation systems include surface flood, and older center pivots or wheel lines which operating efficiencies below 55 percent. On farm irrigation conservation is seen as a key element in addressing improvements in the quantity and quality of surface waters. EQIP funds will be used to promote water conservation through cost share and incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements and irrigation water management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 25
    2 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 61.00 to 63.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 122
    3 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 58.00 to 60.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 116
    4 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 55.00 to 57.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 110
    5 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 52.00 to 54.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 104
    6 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 49.00 to 51.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 98
    7 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 46.00 to 48.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 92
    8 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 43.00 to 45.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 86
    9 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 40.00 to 42.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 80
    10 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 37.00 to 39.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 74
    11 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 34.00 to 36.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 68
    12 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 31.00 to 33.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 62
    13 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 28.00 to 30.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 56
    14 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 25.00 to 27.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 50
    15 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 22.00 to 24.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 33
    16 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 19.00 to 21.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 29
    17 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 16.00 to 18.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 24
    18 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 13.00 to 15.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 13
    19 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 10.00 to 12.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 10
    20 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 7.00 to 9.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 7
    21 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 4.00 to 6.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 4
    22 For applications with an estimated net water savings of 0.01 to 0.99 acre-inches/acre, select this ranking score. (Use standard FIRI Ranking criteria worksheet to calculate net water savings). 1

    Maximum Points:  147
    Total Points:  1264

    High Desert - Klamath - Water Quantity - Water Management Irrigation Land Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Lake - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminates

    Due to of elevated temperatures, nutrient and sediment loads approximately 35% of the county streams are recognized by the Oregon DEQ as impaired water bodies (303d/TMDL listed). Changes in upland hydrology resulting from poor management, natural disasters and/or invasive plant species has led to erosion in both the uplands and active stream channels. As secondary impacts these changes are adversely affecting the profitability of livestock operations and fish and wildlife habitat. The USDA CREP and OR OWEB programs will be used to address restoration within the active channels. As the secondary resource concern for the Lake County LWG EQIP- Regular funds will be used to stabilize upland conditions and promote proper livestock management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 75
    2 Practices providing direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of improvements to livestock management. 100
    3 Practices provide direct benefits to resolve identifiable resource issue(s) related to quantity and/or quality of surface water as a result of the control/eradication of invasive plant species. 50
    4 Practices directly related to the implementation of an NRCS approved CNMP. 25

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:  250

    High Desert - Lake - Water Quality - Surface Water Contaminate Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Funding Pool:  High Desert - Lake - Water Quantity - Water Management - Irrigated Lake

    The Summer Lake 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) sub basin (Fort Rock/Silver Lake Basins) is comprised of 2.6 million acres, mostly in Lake County. Sixty percent of the sub basin is shrub land and rangeland, twenty percent is forestland, and about ten percent is grassland, hay land, and pastureland. There are 167 farms and 278 operators in the sub basin. Many of the farms and ranches are only marginally profitable. Most of the farmers and ranchers are aware of local resource concerns and appreciate the effect conservation has on these concerns; however, due to general enterprise budgets for the farm operations conservation has not been perceived to be economically feasible. Approximately 60% of the sub basin is included within a ground water restricted area recognized by the State of Oregon. The majority of the sub basin’s 71,800 acres of irrigated cropland are located within this area. The principal irrigated crops include alfalfa, grass hay and pasture. Irrigation systems are typically comprised of older center pivots or wheel lines which operating efficiencies below 55 percent. On farm irrigation conservation is seen as a key element in addressing the restricted (over drafted) aquifers. As the primary resource concern for the Lake County LWG EQIP- Regular and EQIP-GSWC funds will be used to promote water conservation through cost share and incentive payments related to irrigation structural improvements and irrigation water management.

    Local Ranking Criteria

    1 Previous contracts with this applicant are current or completed, cancelled with concurrence from NRCS for reason(s) beyond the control of the client, or this will be the applicant's first contract? 75
    2 Will the irrigation improvements result in reductions in withdraws from the Ground Water Restricted Area of the Summer Lake (17120005) Watershed? 65
    3 Will the irrigation improvements result in reductions in withdraws from ground or surface waters outside of the Summer Lake (17120005) Watershed? 45
    4 High cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 35
    5 Medium cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 20
    6 Low cost effectiveness score associated with water savings? 0

    Maximum Points:
    Total Points:  240

    High Desert - Lake - Water Quantity - Water Management - Irrigated Lake Practice Payment List

    This document requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Coming soon

     

    Local Contact:
    Please contact the District Conservationist in the USDA Service Center nearest the location of your property.

    Last Modified:  09/09/2008

    < Back to EQIP